Patent Examiner Michael C. Miggins
Art Unit 1782 · Containers, Tubes, Laminates & Optical Films · Tech Center 1700 · 400 applications filed 2021–2026
Michael C. Miggins is a USPTO patent examiner in Art Unit 1782 (Containers, Tubes, Laminates & Optical Films) with 400 applications from filing years 2021–2026. Examiner Miggins's allowance rate is 83.0%, above the 82.7% USPTO average for applications filed in the same years. The examiner ranks harder than 53% of examiners, whose median allowance rate is 84.2%. In 2021, decided applications with an examiner interview were allowed 35.1 percentage points more often than those without.
Data through October 2026 from USPTO Patent Center (formerly PAIR) · Methodology
Overview
FreeExaminer details
- Art unit1782 · Containers, Tubes, Laminates & Optical Films
- Title / gradePrimary Patent Examiner · GS-14
- Service28 years
- PhoneOn each office action
- Email[email protected]
- In USPTO recordsMIGGINS, MICHAEL C
Examiner Miggins can allow an application without a supervisory sign-off.
How to improve your odds with Examiner Miggins
- The data favors an interview. Interviewed cases were allowed more often in all 3 measured years, by 11.0 to 35.1 points.
- The timeline tracks the norm. First office action averages 610 days vs the 623-day USPTO norm.
- Expect a §103. Obviousness is the most-issued rejection (251), and applicants overcame it 68.1% of the time.
- RCE outcomes are mixed year to year. Cases with an RCE were allowed more often in 2 of the 3 measured years. Weigh the year-by-year table before spending the fee.
Historical patterns from this examiner's past cases, shown for general information. This is not legal advice and does not predict the outcome of any specific application. Decisions about interviews, RCEs, and claim strategy should be made with a licensed patent attorney or agent.
Rejection patterns & how they get overcome
FreeOf the 66 winning responses to Examiner Miggins's §103 rejections that Boundly has classified, 55 (83%) amended the claims and argued, 8 argued without amending, and 3 amended without arguing. Each winning response, with its arguments and claim amendments, is in the file wrapper.
Just got an office action from Examiner Miggins?
Draft your response with Examiner Miggins's record and Art Unit 1782's history in view, including the rejection patterns, the interview record, and the arguments that have overcome them. See how Boundly assists with office action responses.
Trends
| Year | Interview rate | Allowance w/ interview | Allowance w/o | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 22.2% | 100.0% | 87.3% | +12.7pp |
| 2022 | 20.8% | 95.0% | 84.0% | +11.0pp |
| 2021 | 29.4% | 100.0% | 64.9% | +35.1pp |
RCE behavior
Allowance after a Request for Continued Examination versus without one, per year. Use it to judge whether an RCE is worth the cost in front of Examiner Miggins.
| Year | RCE rate | Allowance w/ RCE | Allowance w/o | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 26.3% | 86.7% | 91.2% | -4.5pp |
| 2022 | 25.7% | 91.3% | 84.7% | +6.6pp |
| 2021 | 26.6% | 92.9% | 68.8% | +24.1pp |
Recent outcomes
Free🔒 Case detail for members| App # | Title | Outcome | OAs | Arguments & redline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18/650722 | Easy-Print Packaging Sheet and Manufacturing Method Therefor | Patented | 0 | 🔒 View |
| 18/404784 | Film and Packaging for Gas or Vapor Decontaminable Packaging and Methods Decontaminating Packages | Patented | 1 | 🔒 View |
| 18/698106 | Method for Producing Laminated Body | Patented | 0 | 🔒 View |
| 18/358515 | Sealing Film and Packaging for Gas or Vapor Decontaminable Packaging Applications | Patented | 1 | 🔒 View |
Art Unit 1782 technology
Frequently asked questions
What is Examiner Michael C. Miggins's allowance rate?
Is Examiner Miggins a hard examiner?
Do examiner interviews help with Examiner Miggins?
What is Examiner Miggins's most common rejection?
Is an RCE worth filing with Examiner Miggins?
How long until the first office action from Examiner Miggins?
How do I contact Examiner Michael C. Miggins?
Put Examiner Miggins's data to work on your next response.
Full file-wrapper detail, winning arguments, and AI-assisted drafting in one workspace.