Patent Examiner Dennis H. Pedder
Art Unit 3612 · Land Vehicles: Bodies, Tops & Fenders · Tech Center 3600 · 631 applications since 2021
Dennis H. Pedder is a USPTO patent examiner in Art Unit 3612 (Land Vehicles: Bodies, Tops & Fenders) who has examined 631 applications in filing years 2021–2025. Examiner Pedder's allowance rate is 90.6%, above the 82.1% USPTO average; the examiner ranks easier than 71% of examiners. Applicants who held an examiner interview saw a 6.8 percentage-point lift in allowance in 2023.
Data through March 2026 · Source: USPTO Patent Center (formerly PAIR) · Methodology
Overview
FreeExaminer details
- Art unit3612 · Land Vehicles: Bodies, Tops & Fenders
- Title / gradePrimary Patent Examiner · GS-14
- Service22 years
- PhoneOn each office action
- Email[email protected]
- LocationAlexandria, VA 22314
- On office actionsPedder, Dennis H
Examiner Pedder can allow an application without a supervisory sign-off, which is why an examiner interview can be decisive.
How to improve your odds with Examiner Pedder
- The data favors an interview. Interviewed cases allowed 11.1 points higher in 2022, the largest measured lift on this docket.
- Plan for the timeline. First office action averages 608 days vs the 589-day USPTO norm.
- Expect a §103. Obviousness is the most-issued rejection (368), and applicants overcame it 88.4% of the time.
- RCE outcomes are mixed year to year. 10.4 points up in 2022 but -4.0 in 2021; weigh the year-by-year table before spending the fee.
- This docket has supported broader claims. With a 90.6% allowance rate, preserving breadth where the specification supports it has been viable.
Historical patterns from this examiner's past cases, shown for general information. This is not legal advice and does not predict the outcome of any specific application. Decisions about interviews, RCEs, and claim strategy should be made with a licensed patent attorney or agent.
Rejection patterns & how they get overcome
FreeREMARKS: Applicant respectfully traverses the rejection under 35 U.S.C. §103. The cited references, whether taken alone or in combination, fail to teach or suggest at least the recited limitation, and the Office has not established an adequate rationale to combine the references as proposed without impermissible hindsight in that ...
Just got an office action from Examiner Pedder?
Draft a response grounded in Examiner Pedder's complete prosecution history: the rejection patterns, the interview record, and the arguments that have actually worked. Powered by Boundly AI Studio.
Trends
| Year | Interview rate | Allowance w/ interview | Allowance w/o | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 32.7% | 96.3% | 89.5% | +6.8pp |
| 2022 | 31.6% | 97.8% | 86.7% | +11.1pp |
| 2021 | 24.7% | 98.2% | 87.9% | +10.3pp |
RCE behavior
Allowance after a Request for Continued Examination versus without one, per year. Use it to judge whether an RCE is worth the cost in front of Examiner Pedder.
| Year | RCE rate | Allowance w/ RCE | Allowance w/o | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 5.3% | 100.0% | 89.6% | +10.4pp |
| 2021 | 6.5% | 86.7% | 90.7% | -4.0pp |
Recent outcomes
Free🔒 Case detail: members| App # | Title | Outcome | OAs | Arguments & redline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18/219030 | Roof Strength Moment Cancelling Bulkhead | Patented | 1 | 🔒 View |
| 18/010003 | Vehicle Roof and Vehicle | Patented | 3 | 🔒 View |
| 18/013593 | Method for Producing a Body for a Motor Vehicle, and Body for a Motor Vehicle | Patented | 2 | 🔒 View |
| 18/492888 | Vehicle Roof Having an Openable Folding Roof with a Tensioning Cable System | Patented | 0 | 🔒 View |
Technology & expertise
Frequently asked questions
What is Examiner Dennis H. Pedder's allowance rate?
Is Examiner Pedder a favorable examiner?
Do examiner interviews help with Examiner Pedder?
What is Examiner Pedder's most common rejection?
Is an RCE worth filing with Examiner Pedder?
How long until the first office action from Examiner Pedder?
How do I contact Examiner Dennis H. Pedder?
Put Examiner Pedder's data to work on your next response.
Full file-wrapper detail, winning arguments, and AI drafting in one workspace.